Shared real-time content editing activated by an image

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for instantiating collaboration interfaces via object recognition are disclosed. An object recognition engine communicatively coupled to a database and an electronic device receives sensor data related to an object and identifies an object characteristic. A component is selected having criteria satisfied by the object characteristic and a collaboration interface is instantiated on the electronic device. This can allow a user to edit content related to an object. A substantially identical collaboration interface can be instantiated on a second electronic device to allow collaboration among user with respect to content related to the object.

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.17/112,830, filed on Dec. 4, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S.application Ser. No. 15/843,918, filed on Dec. 15, 2017, now U.S. Pat.No. 10,891,039, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.15/591,017, filed on May 9, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,857,964, which isa continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/155,252, filed on Jan.14, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,678,617, which claims priority to U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/752,091, filed on Jan. 14, 2013. Theseand all other referenced extrinsic materials are incorporated herein byreference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention is collaboration system technologies.

BACKGROUND

The following description includes information that may be useful inunderstanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any ofthe information provided herein is prior art or relevant to thepresently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically orimplicitly referenced is prior art.

As advances in technology continue to be developed, the utilization ofcollaboration systems has become increasingly important in education,work, and entertainment environments. Existing collaboration systemssometimes allow two or more users to interact with respect to someelectronic document or file. However, known systems fail to utilizeobject recognition technologies to customize or otherwise improve thecollaboration experience of users.

For example, Multi-User Interaction on Media Facades through Live Videoon Mobile Device, by Boring et al., CHI 2011 Session: Interaction onMobile Devices (May 7-12, 2011) discusses advances in mobile computingthat allows users to interact with media facades.

Further examples include European Patent Application No. 2458537 toSchneider et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0239135to Spataro et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,332,470 to Arun, U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2011/0225200 to Danis et al., and CanadianPatent Application No. 2547468 to Lusk et al., each of which describespecific systems or methods of collaboration.

Exemplary collaboration systems that are tied to a product in themarketplace include Hewlett Packard's™ Remote Graphics Software,Twiddla's™ collaboration software, and Vyew's™ collaboration and liveconferencing products.

All publications referenced herein are incorporated by reference to thesame extent as if each individual publication or patent application werespecifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.Where a definition or use of a term in an incorporated reference isinconsistent or contrary to the definition of that term provided herein,the definition of that term provided herein applies and the definitionof that term in the reference does not apply.

Unfortunately, the above referenced methods and systems fail to utilizeobject recognition to improve the collaboration experience of users, andsuffer various other shortcomings. For example, Boring et al. requiresthat the collaborators are all located within camera view of a mediafaçade.

As another example, the Danis reference describes collaboration systemsthat are configured to define a privacy policy and harvest collaborationdata allowable under the privacy policy, the systems require that theprivacy policy be defined by a collaborator, while failing to enforceexisting policies. Moreover, the method of Danis appears to be limitedto defining privacy policies, and fails to define other policies, orharvest collaboration data allowable under other policies.

Thus, there is still a need for improved collaboration systems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventive subject matter provides apparatus, systems and methods inwhich an object recognition engine is configured to identify objectcharacteristics from received sensor data, and instantiate acollaboration interface based at least in part on the identified objectcharacteristics.

The instantiated collaboration interface can advantageously be presentedto a first user via an electronic device, and be configured to allow auser to edit content associated with the object. The content associatedwith the object can comprise the representation of the object in thesensor data itself (e.g., an image of the object, an audio recording ofthe object, a video recording of the object, or other representation ofthe object as captured by sensor data), content associated with theobject retrieved based on the object characteristics (e.g., images,audio, video, text, interactive games, software applications, etc.), theactual object itself or a copy thereof (where the actual object is adata file such as word processing file, spreadsheet file, document file,etc.), and a webpage, audio file, word file, image file, spreadsheet, orother item having content associated with the object.

The collaboration interface can further be instantiated on a secondelectronic device, and can be configured to allow a second user to editthe content associated with the object, even where the first and secondelectronic devices are located distally from one another. It iscontemplated that in some embodiments the first user can view or listento an edit by the second user, and vice versa.

Where there is a conflict between a first user's attempted edit and asecond user's attempted edit, a reconciliation engine can be coupledwith an electronic device and provide an indication of such conflict viathe electronic device. Moreover, the reconciliation engine can beconfigured to reconcile the conflict between the attempted edits, forexample, based on a rule associated with the object.

Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the inventivesubject matter will become more apparent from the following detaileddescription of preferred embodiments, along with the accompanyingdrawing figures in which like numerals represent like components.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic of a system of the inventive subject matter.

FIG. 2 is a schematic showing the construction of a collaborationinterface.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a sample method of the inventivesubject matter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Throughout the following discussion, numerous references will be maderegarding servers, services, interfaces, databases, engines, modules,clients, peers, portals, platforms, or other systems formed fromcomputing devices. It should be appreciated that the use of such termsis deemed to represent one or more computing devices having at least oneprocessor (e.g., ASIC, FPGA, DSP, x86, ARM, ColdFire, GPU, multi-coreprocessors, etc.) configured to execute software instructions stored ona computer readable tangible, non-transitory medium (e.g., hard drive,solid state drive, RAM, flash, ROM, etc.). For example, a server caninclude one or more computers operating as a web server, databaseserver, or other type of computer server in a manner to fulfilldescribed roles, responsibilities, or functions. One should furtherappreciate the disclosed computer-based algorithms, processes, methods,or other types of instruction sets can be embodied as a computer programproduct comprising a non-transitory, tangible computer readable mediastoring the instructions that cause a processor to execute the disclosedsteps. The various servers, systems, databases, or interfaces canexchange data using standardized protocols or algorithms, possibly basedon HTTP, HTTPS, AES, public-private key exchanges, web service APIs,known financial transaction protocols, or other electronic informationexchanging methods. Data exchanges can be conducted over apacket-switched network, the Internet, LAN, WAN, VPN, cellular, or othertype of packet switched network.

The following discussion provides many example embodiments of theinventive subject matter. Although each embodiment represents a singlecombination of inventive elements, the inventive subject matter isconsidered to include all possible combinations of the disclosedelements. Thus if one embodiment comprises elements A, B, and C, and asecond embodiment comprises elements B and D, then the inventive subjectmatter is also considered to include other remaining combinations of A,B, C, or D, even if not explicitly disclosed.

A system of the inventive subject matter can allow a user to capture animage, audio, text or video data related to an object, and collaboratewith a second user in editing content associated with the object. Thetwo or more users can be located in close proximity to one another, orcan be located remotely from one another, for example, 1, 5, 10, or even1,000 or more miles away from one another.

FIG. 1 is a schematic of one possible system of the inventive subjectmatter. System 100 can include an object recognition engine 110 that iscommunicatively coupled with a collaboration database 120, at least onesensor (e.g., 130 or 146), and an electronic device 140. The system 100is configured to obtain sensor data 135 related to an object (e.g., datarelated to a photograph of an object) via an external sensor 130, orsensor data 148 via the electronic device's sensor 146. The variouscomponents of system 100 can be communicatively coupled with one or moreother components such that the coupled components can exchange data withone another using one or more of the data exchange methods listed above,as well as data exchange connections such as NFC, wired or wireless dataconnections (e.g., USB, HDMI), WiFi, Bluetooth, data exchangeconnections internal to components and modules of computing devices,etc.

The example of FIG. 1 is presented as shown for illustrative purposesand ease of understanding. As such, the system 100 should not beinterpreted as being limited to only the components as shown in FIG. 1 .For example, the system 100 includes a plurality of electronic devices140, each having their respective system components, to be used by acorresponding plurality of users 150 in a collaboration environment.Similarly, the collaboration database 120 is illustrated with interfacecomponents 122, 124, 126 for the purposes of simplicity, but can haveany number of interface components across one or more databases 120, asallowed by available storage resources.

Sensor data can be considered to be data representative of theconditions, environment or scene captured by the sensor. Examples ofsensor data can include image data (e.g., captured by an image sensorsuch as in a camera), motion or impact data (e.g., for motion sensors,pressure sensors, gyroscopes, and accelerometers), audio data (e.g.,captured by an audio sensor such as a microphone), text, document,application, computer image or other data (e.g., when the sensor isdisposed within a computing device), video data (where the sensorcomprises a video camera, video data can also include a series orsequence of image data viewable as video), temperature data (e.g., atemperature sensor such as a thermometer), and combinations thereof. Thesensor data can be in formats commonly used for the capture and use ofdata by each particular sensor or sensor type. For example, image datacan be in formats such as RAW, JPG, BMP, etc.; audio data in formatssuch as MP3, WMA, WAV, M4P, etc.; video data can be in formats such asWMV, AVI, MPEG-4, etc.

The electronic device 140 can comprise any commercially suitable device,including for example, a mobile phone, a tablet, a phablet, a computer,game console, appliance, television, or other type of computing device.Preferred electronic devices can comprise an electronic device interface142, through which an instantiated collaboration interface 144 can bepresented to a user. As discussed herein, the electronic deviceinterface 142 can be interpreted as referring to input and outputinterfaces of computing devices that allow for a user to receive outputfrom the computing device and enter input into the computing device.Examples of interfaces 142 can include a mouse, keyboard, touch screen,stylus, game controller, display screen, audio output (e.g., speakers,headphones, etc.), voice input, motion sensing input, force feedbackdevices, etc.

The instantiated collaboration interface 144 can be constructed fromcollaboration interface data 112 obtained via the object recognitionengine 110 as a function of the collaboration interface components 122,124, 126. As used herein, the term “collaboration interface component”can be interpreted broadly to include, for example, content associatedwith an object, a video editor, image editor, text editor, game editor,audio editor, an Application Programming Interface (API), a RemoteProcedure Call (RPC), a website hosting content or other functions, andcomponents thereof (e.g., bars, buttons, sliders, menus, etc. to beincluded in an editor, that enable a user to use the editing and othercollaboration functions of the editor).

In embodiments, a collaboration interface component can be directlyrelated to the identified object and/or content associated with theobject. This collaboration interface component can be a separatecomponent (such as an independent editor specific to the content or tothe object) or an add-on to an existing editor component. For example,if the object identified is a movie directed by a director having adistinctive visual style, an image editor or video editor that can beused to edit image content or video clips associated with the movie canbe modified by collaboration interface components specifically relatedto the movie, such that the image or video editor included in theinstantiated collaboration interface 144 can include edits associatedwith the director's visual style (e.g., a particular visual filter,distortion of color or shapes, ability to insert explosion effects intoany aspect of the content, etc.).

The instantiated collaboration interface 144 as presented to a user caninclude various editors having input components that can enable a userto edit, manipulate or otherwise interact with content associated withan object via instantiated collaboration interface 144. The instantiatedcollaboration interfaces 144 and collaboration interface components willbe discussed in further detail below.

The content associated with an object can comprise the representation ofthe object in the sensor data itself (e.g., an image of the object, anaudio recording of the object, a video recording of the object, or otherrepresentation of the object as captured by sensor data), contentassociated with the object stored on a database retrieved based on theobject characteristics (e.g., images, audio, video, text, interactivegames, software applications, etc.), the actual object itself or a copythereof (where the actual object is a data file such as word processingfile, spreadsheet file, document file, etc.). Content can be in the formof image files, video files, word document files, audio files, webpages, spreadsheets, interactive games, text files, softwareapplications, etc. As discussed above, content associated with an objectcan be stored as a collaboration interface component withincollaboration database 120. In embodiments, the content can be stored inone or more separate databases or other non-transitory computer-readablemedia. In these embodiments, the collaboration interface componentcorresponding to the content within collaboration database 120 can be aninformation address, link or other type of information location pointerindicating an electronic or network location of the content as stored inthe separate storage media.

The content associated with the object can be of a different modality orcontent type from that of the sensor data. For example, audio data canbe used to recognize a movie playing in the background of an environmentwhere the user device is detecting audio. However, the content dataassociated with the object (movie) can include video clips, still imagesfrom the movie, interactive games, and other content that is not onlyaudio data. In embodiments where the content comprises the objectrepresentation within the sensor data, the content can be of a data typeextracted from the sensor data. For example, from a video clip havingaudio, the content data to be used can include songs in audio-only form,pieces of audio dialog separated from the corresponding visual aspect ofthe video clip, still images taken from the video clip, etc.

Once the user is presented with instantiated collaboration interface 144via electronic device 140, the user can cause an interaction with (suchas desired edit or manipulation) the content associated with an objectvia a collaboration command 147. The collaboration command 147 can begenerated by the electronic device 140 via the instantiatedcollaboration interface 144, in response to user input corresponding toa content editing collaboration component presented in the instantiatedcollaboration interface 144. In embodiments, the change to the contentrepresented by the collaboration command 147 can be executed by theinstantiated collaboration interface 144 itself. In embodiments, thecollaboration command 147 can be obtained from the collaborationinterface 144 by an editor engine 170, which can incorporate a change tothe content associated with the object in the instantiated collaborationinterface 144 as a function of the collaboration command 147. The editorengine 170 can be communicatively coupled with a reconciliation engine160, which can be configured to reconcile a conflict between two or morecollaboration commands 147.

Examples of contemplated collaboration commands 147 include commands toadd, delete, modify, insert, review, proofread, crop, clip, speed up,highlight, enlarge, shrink, slow down, distort, skew, rotate, reverse,mirror, superimpose, comment upon, manipulate, replace, create, orotherwise edit content, and add or modify a user comment associated withthe content.

The object recognition engine 110 can be configured to obtain sensordata 135,148 from sensors 130,148, where sensor data 135,148 can berepresentative one or more objects, symbols, or other features in anenvironment. Object recognition engine 110 can be configured to employone or more object recognition techniques to recognize the objects inthe environment depicted in the sensor data based on identified objectcharacteristics.

Object recognition by a system of the inventive subject matter canutilize features such as scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT),binary robust invariant scalable keypoints (BRISK), and other objectrecognition technologies. SIFT, BRISK and other suitable objectrecognition technologies are described in co-owned U.S. Pat. Nos.7,016,532; 7,477,780; 7,680,324; 7,403,652; 7,565,008; 7,899,243;7,881,529; and 7,899,252 to Boncyk et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 7,775,437to Cohen et al., all of which are incorporated herein by reference intheir entirety.

For example, image data can be analyzed using one or more objectrecognition technique to establish one or more image characteristics,which can then be used as an index into an object database storing knownobjects according to a priori generated image characteristics asdescribed in the above referenced patents. Audio data can be analyzed torecognize words, sounds, music, rhythms, tempo, and other sonicfeatures, which can then be used to recognize objects capable ofgenerating the sounds or related to the sounds and/or recognizing thesource of the sound (e.g., a sound coming from a particular movie,etc.). Still further, accelerometer data can represent motion signaturesthat can be used to identify an activity (e.g., dance, driving, etc.) ora location through integration of acceleration data. Location data suchas GPS data can be used, optionally in conjunction with image data,identify a location or building. All possible object recognitiontechniques and corresponding object characteristics are contemplated.

Object characteristics can be identified directly from sensor data 135or indirectly from sensor data 135. An example of obtaining objectcharacteristics directly from sensor data 135 can include applyingoptical character recognition (OCR) algorithms to image data in order togenerate one or more words relating to the object. An example ofindirectly obtaining the object characteristics includes using thesensor data 135,148 to recognize a known object, then look-up additionalinformation based on references to the known object.

For example, the object recognition engine 110 can receive image data ofa movie poster. The object recognition engine 110 can analyze the imagedata using object recognition techniques to derive image datacharacteristics, and can use the image data characteristics to identifythe poster of the movie. In embodiments, additional information orcontent associated with the movie depicted in the poster can beretrieved by the object recognition engine 110 based on the identifiedmovie poster, such as editable content or a multi-player game. Inembodiments, the type of content retrieved can be based on the imagedata characteristics used to identify the poster of the movie. Inembodiments, the additional information or content associated with themovie can be retrieved based on keywords associated with the movie,which can be obtained via database lookups using image datacharacteristics, or via techniques such as OCR.

The object recognition engine 110 can be configured to use the derivedobject characteristics to give rise to one or more collaborationinterfaces 144 that allow multiple entities to collaborate with respectto content associated with the recognized object. The objectcharacteristics can be used to construct a query targeting collaborationdatabase 120 storing interface components 122, 124, 126. Such componentscan be stored according to an indexing scheme based on relevant objectcharacteristic modalities (e.g., image-based attributes, audioattributes, OCR text, indirect characteristics, etc.). In response tothe query, collaboration database 120 can return relevant componentsthat can be used to construct the collaboration interface 144.

The collaboration interface 144 can be instantiated according to rulesassociated with one or more of the users, the computing devicesassociated with the users, the object being recognized, and the contentitself. For example, one user can be deemed responsible for initiating,hosting or otherwise “owning” the collaboration by the objectrecognition engine 110 (such as based on the user having obtained thesensor data, or initiated the collaboration and invited other users,etc.), and thus have editing privileges not provided to other “guest”users. As such, the instantiated collaboration interface 144 in thehosting user's device may include the full suite of editing functions,whereas the collaboration interfaces 144 for guest user devices can beinstantiated with certain functions removed. In another example, where acollaboration interface 144 includes a video editor and the content is avideo clip from a movie, the collaboration functions provided to usersin the video editor can be restricted based on copyright and otherintellectual property rights corresponding to the video clip and/or themovie. In yet another example, the collaboration functions of eachcomponent within the interface can be subject to censorship rules. Assuch, the collaboration interface 144 can be instantiated such thatcertain video editor functions in the video editor are unavailable tousers for this content (e.g., limits on saving or sharing a generatededited clip, limits on the types of edits possible, etc.). In yetanother example, the collaboration capabilities of components includedin the instantiated collaboration interface 144 can be modified based onthe capabilities of one or more of the user devices (e.g., networkingcapabilities, hardware/software limitations such as processing power, OSused and version, display capabilities, etc.).

Continuing with the previous example of a movie poster, once the posteris recognized by the object recognition engine 110, the collaborationdatabase 120 can be queried and return interface components 122,124,126that allow multiple users to collaborate with each other to placeaugmented reality versions of the movie characters in a setting, play ashared game related to the movie, comment on the movie in a review forumdiscussion, edit clips or still images from the movie, generateringtones or sound-bites from dialogue in the movie, participate in apromotion associated with a product placed in the movie, or otherwiseinteract together with content that is made available as triggered byrecognition with the poster. More than one of these collaborationoptions can be instantiated into a single collaboration interface 144,whereby the users can collaborate or interact with multiple contentitems associated with the movie simultaneously.

In embodiments, the system 100 can include a construction engine 150,which can be configured to construct one or more complete or partialcollaboration interfaces to be instantiated on electronic device 140.For example, various collaboration interface components (e.g., 122, 124,126, etc.) obtained via the collaboration database 120 can be includedin a single collaboration interface that is stored in a database forfuture instantiation. These collaboration interface components forpre-constructed collaboration interfaces can be gathered according tocontent themes, content types, common collaboration functions forparticular content types, common associations between different contenttypes of a same topic or theme, etc. These pre-constructed collaborationinterfaces can be considered high-level, and as such, can be consideredto be generic templates for possible interfaces to be instantiated. Thusupon instantiation, the collaboration interface can include theinterface components of the pre-constructed interface as well asadditional interface components that can be specific to the particularcontent being used (including the content itself), characteristics ofthe particular collaboration enabled by the individual instantiatedcollaboration interface, collaboration rules associated with the contentand/or one or more of the collaborating users (or their devices), etc.

For example, a pre-constructed interface can comprise a video editor andinclude a play button, a fast forward button, a rewind button, a stopbutton, a delete button, an upload interface, a comment button, a speedadjusting slider, a color adjusting slider, and a video display elementconfigured to present a representation of a video. As it is apre-constructed interface, this interface lacks an association of withany content representative of a recognized sensed object. Uponrecognizing an object within received sensor data, the objectrecognition server 110 can obtain the pre-constructed collaborationinterface via construction engine 150 (or database storing theconstructed collaboration interfaces) and further instantiate it withone or more interface components from the collaboration database 120corresponding to the content associated with the sensed object. Based onrules associated with one or more of the content, the collaboratingusers, and the respective users' devices, one or more of the componentsof the video editor can be modified or removed, such that thecollaboration functions associated with those components are restrictedor eliminated from use by one or more of the users.

System 100 can also optionally be coupled with a reconciliation engine160, which is configured to provide an indication of a conflict betweentwo or more collaboration commands and is described in further detailbelow.

While the sample system 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 depicts the objectrecognition engine 110, the collaboration database 120, the constructionengine 150, the reconciliation engine 160 and the editor engine 170 asexternal to the electronic device 140, it is contemplated that, inembodiments, one or more of the object recognition engine 110, thecollaboration database 120, the construction engine 150, thereconciliation engine 160 and the editor engine 170 can be integral tothe electronic device 140 that instantiates the collaboration interface144.

In embodiments, the collaboration interface 144 can be instantiated bythe object recognition engine 110 (or caused to be instantiated by theengine 110) externally from the electronic device 140, such as in adedicated server or other computing device, and provided to theelectronic device 140. In one aspect of these embodiments, thecollaboration interface 144 can be instantiated externally from theelectronic device 140 and then communicated to the electronic device 140for instantiation within the device 140. In another aspect of theseembodiments, the collaboration interface 144 can be instantiatedexternally from the device 140 and presented to the device 140 via avirtualized interface, such that the device 140 only serves to presentthe interface 144 to the user and receive user input related to thecollaboration. In these embodiments, the computing device instantiatingthe collaboration interface 144 is communicatively coupled with theobject recognition engine 110, electronic device 140 and any other userdevices such that the collaboration interface 144 is presented to andallows interaction from the user via electronic device interface 142.

FIG. 2 is a schematic showing the construction of a collaborationinterface. FIG. 2 also illustrates example components of an instantiatedcollaboration interface. For purposes of this example, it should bepresumed that user 210 has captured an image of a “for rent” sign via acamera-enabled first electronic device 215 and caused sensor (i.e.image) data to be transmitted to object recognition engine 205. Itshould also be presumed that user 220 has captured a video/audiorepresentation of a cooking show via a video-camera enabled secondelectronic device 225 and caused sensor (video and audio) data to betransmitted to object recognition engine 205, and has selected a textfile saved on second electronic device 225 and caused text data(corresponding to “sensor data” for the purposes of the functionscarried out by the object recognition engine) to be transmitted toobject recognition engine 205.

The object recognition engine 205 of FIG. 2 can correspond to the objectrecognition engine 110 of FIG. 1 . Likewise, the user devices 215,225having instantiated collaboration interfaces 230,240 and deviceinterfaces 250,260, respectively, can each correspond to the electronicdevice 140, instantiated collaboration interface 144, and electronicdevice interface 142 of FIG. 1 .

Upon receiving sensor data via the first or second electronic devices(215, 225), sensor data from an external sensor (such as sensor 130 inFIG. 1 ) or upon selection of sensor data stored in one of theelectronic devices or in another storage location to be incorporatedinto one or more collaboration interfaces 230,240, the objectrecognition engine 205 can be configured to identify a set of objectcharacteristics from the sensor data by using one or more objectrecognition techniques, and select a set of collaboration interfacecomponents having selection criteria satisfied by the objectcharacteristics to be included within the instantiated collaborationinterfaces 230,240 on the first and second electronic devices (215,225), respectively. As discussed above, collaboration interfacecomponents within the selected set can include the content associatedwith the identified object that will be the subject of thecollaboration. One or both of the instantiated interfaces 230,240 canalso comprise a representation of the object obtained, or other content,by the object recognition engine 205.

It is contemplated that the sensor data and/or content data associatedwith the identified object (e.g., image data, video/audio data, textdata, other content associated with the sign, cooking show and/or textdocument) can be used to instantiate a single collaboration interface onone or more electronic devices (as shown in this example), or can beused to instantiate two or more collaboration interfaces on one or moreelectronic devices simultaneously or sequentially.

As the object recognition engine 205 is communicatively coupled withfirst electronic device 215 and second electronic device 225, the objectrecognition engine 205 can cause the instantiation of the collaborationinterfaces 230,240 in the respective device. The first collaborationinterface 230 is instantiated in the first device 215, and presented tothe user 210 via a first device interface 250 of first electronic device215. The second collaboration interface 240 is instantiated in thesecond device 225, and presented to the user 220 via second deviceinterface 260 of second electronic device 225.

As previously mentioned, an instantiated collaboration interface cancomprise various components, including for example, a video editor,image editor, text editor, game editor, audio editor, bars (e.g.,minimizer, maximizer, zoom in, zoom out, etc.), buttons, sliders, menus,any suitable graphical user interface element (GUI element), or anyother suitable components. It is contemplated that all of the componentsof an instantiated collaboration interface can be obtained via one ormore databases (such as one or more collaboration databases 120).

In the example illustrated in FIG. 2 , the first instantiatedcollaboration interface 230 and second instantiated collaborationinterface 240 generally comprise similar interface components, selectedbased on having selection criteria satisfied by the objectcharacteristics. For example, the object characteristics identified fromthe image data can have selection criteria requiring that a component issuitable for editing an image. Thus, the components identified forinstantiation would be suitable for performing such edits.

Each instantiated collaboration interface comprises some of the samecomponents, for example, a tool bar (270, 280), minimizer and maximizerbuttons, a close button, font adjusters, an image editor (274, 284),video editor (276, 286), and text editor (272, 282). However, the firstinstantiated collaboration interface 230 and second instantiatedcollaboration interface 240 can include differences, even within similarinterface components.

For example, image editor 274 and image editor 284 each comprise awebsite associated with the for rent sign captured by user 210, andvarious optional components such as a color palette drop down menu, awebsite navigation menu, a slider bar that allows a user to adjust thesize of the representation or other item of the editor, as well as anyother component that can generally be found in a Microsoft™ Paint,Microsoft™ Word or other similar program. The website associated withthe “for rent” sign can be an apartment management company's websitethat provides images, prices, and specs associated with the apartmentdisplaying the for rent sign.

The differences between collaborations interfaces 230 and 240 can begenerated based on user preferences, user access permissions, usercollaboration hierarchy (e.g., the user initiating the collaborations,the user that ‘owns’ or is hosting the collaboration, etc.), usercontent ownership, user content access permissions, user profiles, userdevice capabilities, and other factors.

FIG. 2 illustrates possible differences between the collaborationinterfaces 230,240. In this example, the image editor 274 is consideredto comprise full image editing capabilities, while image editor 284 isconsidered to comprise partial editing capabilities (represented in FIG.2 as the “grayed out” background of image editor 284). As such, imageeditor 274 can allow user 210 to perform the full suite of image editingfunctions which can include adding a comment on the representation,modifying a font, text, color, size or other appearance of therepresentation, cropping the representation, rotating therepresentation, inserting audio comments, inserting video comments, andso forth. However, image editor 284 can be restricted to allow user 220(or other user) to add textual, audio or video comments.

As another example, text editor 272 and text editor 282 also generallycomprise the same components, including a digital representation of thedocument selected by user 220. However, user 220 is completely blockedfrom making any edits to the representation via text editor 282 (againrepresented by the “grayed out” background within text editor 282),while user 210 can utilize the various text editor components includedin text editor 272 to edit the representation.

The preceding description in relation to FIG. 2 describes contentediting where the content to be edited can comprise a representation ofthe object (as depicted in the sensor data), content associated with theobject that is retrieved by the object recognition engine (such as froma collaboration interface component from a collaboration database), orcontent included in a webpage or other item presented via aninstantiated collaboration interface. Much of this description is alsoapplicable where the content to be edited comprises the object itself.For example, a text document can be identified from a captured imagedepicting a computer screen having the text document visible within thecomputer screen. In this example, the identified text document can bethe object recognized by the object recognition engine, and uponrecognition, can also be the content that is edited by collaboratingusers. It is also contemplated that content editing where the contentcomprises the object itself can be achieved utilizing, among otherthings, technology described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,564,469 to Cohen.

As shown in FIG. 2 , video editor 276 and video editor 286 comprise thesame components, and can be utilized by users 210 and 220 (or otherusers having access to first or second electronic devices (215, 225) toperform various edits. These components include a digital representationof the video captured by user 220, an audio file uploading component, aplay button, a fast forward button, a rewind button, a slow button, apause button, a close button, or any other suitable component. Suitablecomponents can include those included in Movavi™ products and othervideo editing software.

Once user 210 or user 220 have completed their collaboration (i.e.,directed an electronic device to generate 0, 1, 5, 10, or even 50 ormore collaboration commands via the instantiated collaborationinterface), it is contemplated that one or more of the versions of thecollaborated-upon, edited content (i.e., before and after any singleedit, including the final version) can be saved to one or more of theelectronic devices, sent to an email address, sent other devices via MMSor text message, saved in a database communicatively coupled with theobject recognition engine, modified further according to additionalcollaboration commands, uploaded to a website for sharing or publication(e.g., via social networking sites, video hosting sites, etc.), and/ordeleted. The actions to be taken on edited content can be based on auser preference or default action, and can be based upon rulesassociated with the content or object restricting the use of the contentpre- and post-modification.

It is contemplated that one set of sensor data (e.g., video/audio datafrom a captured video/audio) can be used to instantiate a collaborationinterface having collaboration components directed to different items ofcontent. This can be automatic, or in response to a user request.

In an embodiment illustrating one example of using one set of sensordata to instantiate a collaboration interface with collaborationcomponents using different items of content, the collaborationcomponents can be directed to items of content that are separatedversions of a combined item of content. For example, a user may wish tohave two interfaces shown side by side with respect to a singleaudio/video recording of a car speeding down a street. One component canbe used to edit a video aspect (i.e., the captured moving imagery), andthe other component can be used to edit an audio aspect (i.e., thecaptured sound). The user can enter a command or request when the videocontent is selected (in embodiments where the content is retrieved, suchas from the component database 120) or capturing the video/audio data(e.g., in embodiments the content to be used is object representationwithin the captured sensor data) that an audio editor and a video editorbe instantiated in two separate interfaces. Alternatively oradditionally, the system can be configured to implement a default rulethat where received sensor data comprises two or more different types ofdata, a separate interface shall be provided for each type.

In an embodiment illustrating a second example of using one set ofsensor data to instantiate a collaboration interface with collaborationcomponents using different items of content, the object recognitionengine 110 can recognize multiple objects represented in a single set ofsensor data, and the components of the instantiated collaborationinterface can individually apply to each recognized object. For example,if the sensor data is captured video data that includes a clip of atelevision show, and the clip of the television show depicts a characterdriving a particular car, the object recognition engine 110 canrecognize the television show as an object and the car within the showas another object. As such, the collaboration components can be relatedto (and include) content and components associated with each of the TVshow and the car. For example, the instantiated collaboration interface144 can include a video editor allowing a user to edit clips of the TVshow, and a modeling application that allows the user to build their ownversion of the car (including options, color, etc., such as for aprospective purchase).

In embodiments, the items of content associated with individualcollaboration components, such as the “for rent” sign, the cooking showclip and the text file of FIG. 2 can be linked, such that collaborationcommands applying to individual collaboration components (e.g., theimage editor, video editor, and text file editor) can be linked to oneor more of the other collaboration components, whereby the editingeffect of a collaboration command on one item of content has anassociated effect with a second item of content.

In one example, the video editor can allow for the insertion of the “forrent” sign representation into the video clip of the cooking show, suchthat in exterior shots of the cooking show, the host's house can nowappear to be for sale. As the image of the “for sale” sign is edited inthe image editor 274, the appearance of the sign in the video can besimilarly changed by the video editor 276. Similarly, the image of the“for sale” sign or a clip of the video can be embedded into the textdocument, wherein changes in the image file performed with the imageeditor 274 or the video file by using the video editor 276 can result incorresponding changes of the image or video clip embedded into thedocument file being edited in text editor 272. Likewise, the video canbe edited by embedding comments at particular parts of the video usingeditor 276, with corresponding links or citations to the video added tothe text document using text editor 272. As such, as the text editor 272is used to edit the section of the document including the comment to bedisplayed in the video, the video editor 272 can update the text at thecorresponding parts of the video clip to display the updated version ofthe comments.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method 300 implementing functionsand processes to enable the collaboration of one or more users accordingto the inventive subject matter. The method described in FIG. 3 can beimplemented, for example, via the system illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 .

At step 301, the system 100 can provide access to an object recognitionengine, such as engine 110, to one or more users, such as user 150. Thisaccess can be provided via a communicative coupling between anelectronic device 140 accessible to a user and the other components ofthe system (e.g., engine 110, engines 150,160, 170, and other componentssuch as computing devices or modules that can handle any registrationand login functions of a particular system). The access to the objectrecognition engine 110 can be provided via an application downloaded tothe electronic device 140, via a website access via a browser onelectronic device 140, etc. The access to the object recognition engine110 and other components of the system 100 to access the collaborationfunctions enabled by the inventive subject matter can be subscription orpayment-based, and can require user authentication, such as by the entryof a user identifier and a password for the user.

At step 302, the system 100 provides access to a collaboration database,such as collaboration database 120, storing collaboration interfacecomponents such as components 122,124,126. It is also contemplated thatthe system 100 can provide access to other database(s), including, forexample, databases storing sensor data, digital representations ofobjects, content associated with objects, edited representations, editedcontent associated with objects, user uploaded electronic files, or anyother data associated with a device or user. Additional databases canalso include databases associated with registration/verification/loginfunctions, databases associated with object recognition functions, etc.In embodiments, the access provided at step 302 can be providedsimultaneously with the access to the object recognition engine 110provided step 301. In embodiments, the access to various databases canbe provided on an “as needed” basis, wherein access is only provided atthe time that data or information from the various databases is neededto carry out functions and processes associated with the inventivesubject matter and other functions of system 100.

At step 303, the object recognition engine 110 can receive sensor datarepresentative of one or more objects as detected by one or moresensors. The sensor can be a sensor 146 internal to a user's electronicdevice 140 or an external sensor 130. As discussed above, contemplatedsensor data can include image data, text data, video data, audio data,etc. Examples of objects represented by sensor data can includebillboard signs, television shows, movies, advertisements, documents,PDFs, spreadsheets, photographs, sculptures, geographic locations,images, music, YouTube™ clips, an X-ray image, a CT scan image, afashion item, a combination thereof, or any other physical (real-world)or digital object can be photographed, video recorded, audio recorded,downloaded, or otherwise captured by a sensor.

At step 304, the object recognition engine 110 uses one or more objectrecognition techniques to identify (e.g., directly, indirectly or both)a set of object characteristics (e.g., characteristics of or relating tothe object, characteristics of or relating to the type of sensor dataobtained, etc.) from the sensor data related to an object represented bythe sensor data. The object characteristics can include one or more of asound, a motion, a color, a size, a curvature or other characteristic ofthe object, a sensor data type identifier (e.g., identifying the sensordata as image data, video data, audio data, text data, etc., andincluding the identification of the sensor data as a combinationthereof), a characteristic of the sensor data itself, and other type ofdata.

At step 305, the object recognition engine 110 selects one or morecollaboration interface components 122,124,126 from the collaborationdatabase 120 based on one or more of the object characteristics, fromwhich a collaboration interface can be instantiated. In embodiments, thecollaboration interface components can be selected based on selectioncriteria satisfied by the object characteristics. In furtherembodiments, the collaboration interface components can be selectedbased on a mapping of one or more object characteristics to one or morecollaboration interface components, wherein the mapping serves tosatisfy selection criteria. In other words, an interface component canbe selected based on its suitability for use with content, such asallowing a desired edit to be made to content related to an object. Forexample, where the object characteristic identifies the content relatedto the object as audio data, a selected collaboration interfacecomponent can comprise, among other things, a vocal reducer, a voiceoverapplication, a noise reducer, a silencer, amplifier, normalizer,equalizer, echo slider, or a ringtone generating application. As anotherexample, where the object characteristic comprises curvature data of anobject, a selected collaboration interface component can allow a user toedit the curvature of the object.

As discussed above, in embodiments, the collaboration interfacecomponents can include the content itself that is to be the subject ofthe collaboration. In embodiments, the content can be the representationof the object within the sensor data itself.

As described in step 306 and in the description above, the objectrecognition engine 110 can then cause the instantiation of acollaboration interface on an electronic device 140 from the set ofcollaboration interface components.

At step 307, the object recognition engine 110 can initiate an actiontargeting one or more user electronic devices 140 prior to configuringthe device(s) to generate a collaboration command as described in step308. The initiated action can comprise a synchronizing action (e.g., tosynchronize the devices participating in the collaborative environment),a network test action, an updating action (e.g., such as to update adevice's software application to the most current version for use, toupdate content to a new version, etc.), a phone call (e.g., to technicalsupport where the object comprises a broken or otherwise non-functioningwireless router, to alert a user that the collaboration is about tobegin, etc.), a text message (e.g., to provide devices with copies ofthe sensor data originally used to select collaboration components foruse in the collaboration, such as where a user captures an image of atelevision screen showing an American Idol™ contestant, etc.), asoftware process (e.g., a download of an Angry Birds™ mobile applicationwhere the object comprises a Angry Birds™ magazine advertisement or QRcode therein, etc.), or any other suitable action that can be useful toa collaboration with respect to an object.

At step 308, the first electronic device 140 generates a firstcollaboration command (such as collaboration command 147 of FIG. 1 ) viathe instantiated collaboration interface 144, corresponding to arequested edit to the content, such as an edit entered by the user viathe device interface 142. The first collaboration command 147 can allowthe user to view the requested edit performed via a collaborationinterface component via an electronic device. The generation of thecollaboration command can be automatic upon an input of an edit by auser, or can require an action by a user or system of the inventivesubject matter (such as a confirmation action or authorization action).In embodiments, the edit corresponding to the collaboration command 147can be provided to an editor engine 170 and executed by the editorengine 170.

For example, where a user inputs edit selections to delete 5 seconds ofan audio clip via an audio or music editor component of an instantiatedcollaboration interface 144, the object recognition engine 110 canautomatically generate a collaboration command to delete the audio clipin the instantiated collaboration interface(s). Alternatively, thesystem can, among other things, require that a second user approve ofthe deletion via an instantiated collaboration interface prior togenerating the command, or generate (or not generate) the command inaccordance with a rule associated with the object.

Contemplated rules associated with an object can be stored in a databasecommunicatively coupled with an object recognition engine, and caninclude, for example, a rule that governs instantiation and operation ofthe instantiated collaboration interface, a copyright rule, a trademarkrule, a patent rule, a contract rule, a language rule, an intellectualproperty rule, a privacy rule, a censorship rule, or a version controlrule. One or more of the rules can be enforced via at least one of theobject recognition engine and the instantiated collaboration interface.In this manner, a system can be used to enforce a right associated withan object (e.g., person, copyrighted work, trademark, etc.).

For example, a user may wish to capture an image of an image ofCatherine Zeta Jones, and utilize a system of the inventive subjectmatter to edit the image with a friend. While certain edits to arepresentation of the image of Catherine Zeta Jones may be allowable bya rule (e.g., as a fair use), other edits may be restricted by acopyright rule or moral rights rule. Thus, the system may allow the userto comment upon the image of Catherine Zeta Jones, while restricting aconversion of the image into grayscale.

In some embodiments of the inventive subject matter, the collaborationinterface(s) instantiated in step 306 can also be instantiated on asecond electronic device (a second electronic device 140) to allow acollaboration between two or more users, as described in step 309. Asillustrated in FIG. 2 , the same or similar collaboration interfaces canbe instantiated on multiple user devices, allowing for the collaborationby multiple users. The collaboration interfaces can differ from user touser, as discussed above with regard to user collaboration/access rulesand permissions.

At step 310, the second electronic device generates a secondcollaboration command via the collaboration interface instantiated onthe second electronic device, as described in step 310. In suchembodiments, a conflict may arise between a first collaboration commandand a second collaboration command.

In embodiments, the object recognition engine 110 can target an actiontargeting the second electronic device in the same way that the firstelectronic device is targeted at step 307, prior to the execution ofstep 310.

A reconciliation engine 160 that is communicatively coupled to theobject recognition engine 110 can be configured to provide an indicationof a conflict between two or more collaboration commands from twodifferent users, as executed at step 311. A conflict can be detected bythe reconciliation engine 160 when conflicting commands are received

Where such an indication is provided, it is contemplated that the two ormore users can determine which command to generate or incorporate intoan instantiated collaboration interface or representation. Thisdetermination can be via a vote, via a suggested alternative command toone or more of the users, via a selection of a recommended command amongthe conflicting commands, etc. In embodiments, the determination can besingle-handedly made by a user according to a hierarchy of users in thecollaboration, whereby the option to determine the command to generateand implement can be decided by the single user of a highest hierarchy(e.g. hosting user, initiating user, sensor data gathering user, contentowner, etc.).

At step 312, the reconciliation engine 160 reconciles the conflict(i.e., performs revision control and conflict resolution). Thisreconciliation can be performed via a centralized revision controlsystem (e.g., file locking, version merging, collaboration commandprioritizing and synchronization etc.) distributed revision control,integrated version control support, or any other suitable model orsystem of version control.

In embodiments, the conflict can be reconciled by the reconciliationengine 160 without first providing the indication of the conflict ofstep 311. In these embodiments, the reconciliation engine 160automatically resolves any detected conflicts according toreconciliation rules and/or criteria.

A reconciliation performed by the reconciliation engine 160 of theinventive subject matter can be based at least in part on one or more ofthe sensor data received by the object recognition engine 110, a ruleassociated with an object captured by the sensor data, the objectcharacteristics identified from the sensor data, a rule associated withthe content associated with the captured object, and one or morecollaboration interface components from which the collaborationinterface is instantiated. For example, a rule governing areconciliation can require that a command generated via the electronicdevice on which the collaboration interface is first instantiated has ahigher priority than a command generated via second, third, or laterdevices. As another example, a rule governing a reconciliation canrequire that a command generated by the electronic device that islocated nearest to a sensor that transmitted sensor data related to theobject to the object recognition server has the highest priority. As yetanother example, a rule governing a reconciliation can require that acommand correlating to an edit by the user who initiated thecollaboration (e.g., first caused sensor data to be transmitted to theobject recognition engine, etc.) has priority over all other commands.

An example of a reconciliation of a conflict between two collaborationcommands is described in the following use case. Lisa is studying in herUNC dorm room and wants to play a game of chess with Lindsey who is at acoffee shop in Boston. Lisa takes a picture of a chess board and a chesspiece with her cell phone, and transmits the image data to an objectrecognition engine that is implemented on her cell phone as part of amobile application. The object recognition engine identifies a set ofobject characteristics from the image data related to the chess board,and a second set of object characteristics from the image data relatedto the chess piece. The object recognition server then selects a set ofcollaboration interface components having selection criteria satisfiedby both set of object characteristics and a collaboration interface isinstantiated on Lisa's cell phone from the selected set of collaborationinterface components.

In this example, the instantiated collaboration interface comprisesrepresentations of: a chess board; 1 white king piece; 1 black kingpiece; 1 white queen piece; 1 black queen piece; 2 white rook pieces; 2black rook pieces; 2 white bishop pieces; 2 black bishop pieces; 2 whiteknight pieces; 2 black knight pieces; 8 white pawn pieces; and 8 blackpawn pieces. Each representation of a piece is located in theappropriate starting position of the representation of the chess board.The instantiated collaboration interface also comprises two arrows, eachof which can be used to select a chess piece and move it to a differentposition.

Lisa inputs a request via the mobile application to invite Lindsey via atext message to her cell phone and an instant message to her Facebook™and Gmail™ accounts. Lindsey accepts the request, and the instantiatedcollaboration interface is further instantiated on Lindsey's computer.

Lisa uses one arrow to select a white pawn piece and moves it diagonallyto the right. Lindsey simultaneously selects the same white pawn pieceand moves it diagonally to the left. Thus, Lisa's cell phone shows theselected white pawn piece in one location while Lindsey's computer showsit in a different location. Each device receives an alert indicating theconflict, and the conflict is automatically reconciled according to adefault rule that the first player controls the white pieces and thesecond player controls the black pieces. Thus, the white pawnrepresented on Lindsey's device is automatically moved two spaces to theright.

Another example of a reconciliation is described in the following usecase. Architect Valerie and interior designer Vanessa are working on anaddition to Melissa's house in Connecticut. Valerie has created ablueprint of what the addition currently looks like and Vanessa wouldlike to remotely view the blueprint so that she can determine how muchspace she has to work with.

Valerie transmits an electronic file comprising sensor data related tothe blueprint to an object recognition engine of the inventive subjectmatter via her computer. Based in part on the received sensor data, theobject recognition engine identifies object characteristics from theimage and instantiates a collaboration interface on Valerie's computer,the interface comprising a three dimensional model of the blueprintobjects, a view adjuster, a drawing tool, an image uploading tool, acolor palette, a zoom function, a crop tool, and an expansion tool.

As described above, these components can be selected from acollaboration database communicatively coupled with the objectrecognition engine. If Valerie wants to remove a component of theinstantiated collaboration interface, it is contemplated that she cansimply click on a symbol related to the component. If Valerie wants toadd a component to the instantiated collaboration interface, it iscontemplated that she can be presented with optional components toselect from and move to a desired location within the interface.

Valerie, satisfied with the originally instantiated collaborationinterface components, sends a request to the object recognition engineto instantiate the same collaboration interface on Vanessa's computer.The object recognition engine sends a link to Vanessa's email addressfrom which Vanessa opens the instantiated collaboration interface.

Valerie and Vanessa, viewing substantially identical collaborationinterfaces, make various edits to the three dimensional modelrepresentative of changes they wish to make on Melissa's addition. Forexample, Valerie utilizes the expansion tool to expand a game room ofthe three dimensional model. Viewing this change, Vanessa utilizes animage uploading tool to add a representation of a sectional to the gameroom. Thus, using a system of the inventive subject matter, Valerie andVanessa can collaborate with one another remotely to achieve the bestarchitecture and design combination for Melissa.

Other contemplated uses for systems of the inventive subject matterinclude, among other things, telemedicine, retail activities, designactivities, training activities, or education.

As used herein, and unless the context dictates otherwise, the term“coupled to” is intended to include both direct coupling (in which twoelements that are coupled to each other contact each other) and indirectcoupling (in which at least one additional element is located betweenthe two elements). Therefore, the terms “coupled to” and “coupled with”are used synonymously.

As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow,the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless thecontext clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the descriptionherein, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the contextclearly dictates otherwise.

The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve asa shorthand method of referring individually to each separate valuefalling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, eachindividual value is incorporated into the specification as if it wereindividually recited herein. All methods described herein can beperformed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein orotherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and allexamples, or exemplary language (e.g. “such as”) provided with respectto certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminatethe invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of theinvention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should beconstrued as indicating any non-claimed element essential to thepractice of the invention.

Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the inventiondisclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each groupmember can be referred to and claimed individually or in any combinationwith other members of the group or other elements found herein. One ormore members of a group can be included in, or deleted from, a group forreasons of convenience and/or patentability. When any such inclusion ordeletion occurs, the specification is herein deemed to contain the groupas modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markushgroups used in the appended claims.

It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many moremodifications besides those already described are possible withoutdeparting from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subjectmatter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of theappended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification andthe claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possiblemanner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises”and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements,components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that thereferenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized,or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are notexpressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to at leastone of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . andN, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from thegroup, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-based game collaboration system,comprising: at least one non-transitory computer readable memory storingsoftware instructions and a collaboration database, wherein thecollaboration database stores a plurality of collaboration interfacecomponents indexed by object characteristics and object locations; andat least one processor coupled with the at least one non-transitorycomputer readable memory and the collaboration database, and configuredto, via execution of the software instructions, execute the followingoperations: receive sensor data from at least one device and related toa game object, including location data representing a location, whereinthe game object is associated with a collaboration target within anaugmented reality game; identify a set of object characteristics,including at least the location, associated with the game object fromthe sensor data; select from the collaboration database a set ofcollaboration interface components from the plurality of thecollaboration interface components, wherein each collaboration interfacecomponent of the set of collaboration interface components satisfyselection criteria based on at least some of the set of objectcharacteristics; instantiate a first collaboration interface and asecond collaboration interface, each interface comprising at least aportion of the augmented reality game, from the set of collaborationinterface components on a first electronic device associated with afirst player and a second electronic device associated with a secondplayer, respectively, wherein the first collaboration interface isinstantiated based on the collaboration target in the portion of theaugmented reality game, on the location, and on at least one firstplayer characteristic, and wherein the second collaboration interface isinstantiated based on the collaboration target in the portion of theaugmented reality game, on the location, and on at least one secondplayer characteristic; enable the first electronic device to generate afirst collaboration command via the instantiated first collaborationinterface and the second electronic device to generate a secondcollaboration command via the instantiated second collaborationinterface; detect a conflict between the first collaboration command andthe second collaboration command; provide an indication of the conflictbetween the first collaboration command and the second collaborationcommand; and reconcile the conflict between the first collaborationcommand with the second collaboration command based at least in part onone of the following: a vote of one or more users, a user selectionbased a user hierarchy, a recommendation based on rules, and arecommendation based on criteria.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein theat least one first player characteristic and the at least one secondplayer characteristic are at least one of the following: a user gamepreference, a user access permission, a user game content ownership, auser hosting status, and a portion of a user game profile.
 3. The systemof claim 1, wherein the conflict is reconciled based on at least aportion of the sensor data.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein theconflict is reconciled based on the at least one first playercharacteristic and the at least one second player characteristic.
 5. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the conflict is reconciled based on at leastin part on an attribute of the game object.
 6. The system of claim 1,wherein the user hierarchy comprises one or more of the following: auser ownership, a user hosting, a user preference, a user status, a usercontent permission, a user initiation, and a user device capability. 7.The system of claim 1, wherein the rules are based on one or more of thefollowing: the game object rules, a copyright rules, contract rules,privacy rules, censorship rules, version control rules, game rules,moral rights rules, access rules, permission rules, command priorityrules, and content rules.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the secondelectronic device is remote from the first electronic device.
 9. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the second collaboration interface isinstantiated based on a proximity of the second electronic device to thefirst electronic device.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the firstcollaboration interface is based on a proximity of the first electronicdevice to the game object and the second collaboration interface isbased on a proximity of the second electronic device to the game object.11. The system of claim 1, wherein the first collaboration interface andthe second collaboration interface are based on at least one of thefollowing: a first user game preference, a second, different user gamepreference, a first user game content ownership, a second, differentuser game content ownership, a first user game profile, a second,different user game profile, a first user device status, a first userdevice networking capability, a second, different user device status,and a second, different user device networking capability.
 12. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is furtherconfigured to allow a user to make a purchase relating to the gameobject.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the purchase comprises atleast one of the following: a new set of collaboration interfacecomponents, new game content, new editing permission, a new userinterface, a new game component, a new game editing command and a newgame module.
 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the first electronicdevice or the second electronic device comprises one or more of thefollowing devices: a cell phone, a tablet, a phablet, a computer, a gameconsole, and mobile phone.
 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the firstcollaboration command or second collaboration command comprises one ormore of the following: an add command, a delete command, a modifycommand, an insert command, a review command, a proofread command, acrop command, a clip command, a speed up command, a highlight command,an enlarge command, a shrink command, a slowdown command, a distortcommand, a skew command, a rotate command, a reverse command, a mirrorcommand, a superimpose command, a comment upon command, a manipulatecommand, a replace command, and a create command.
 16. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the sensor data is one or more of the following:temperature data, image data, motion data, pressure data, gyroscopedata, accelerometer data, audio data, video data, location data, textdata, and GPS data.